www.eduhookups.com

          One of the major differences between high school and college is the connotation of the term “hooking up”.  So in junior or high school when everyone heard that “Bobby” and  “Trixie” were hooking up, it spread around school faster than you could say sex. This is vastly different than the college view. As college students, we have the image of having indiscriminate sex and are portrayed as having a lifestyle of hook up after hook up. Not to discount this lifestyle for some students, but there is a significant portion of the student body (on any collegial campus) who, while they might engage in sexual relationships, are not continuously promiscuous. 

            Have you heard of the website www.eduhookups.com? It was started by the University of Chicago to dissuade the rumor that the “U of C” wasn’t where “fun comes to die” or where “the squirrels are cuter than the girls and more aggressive than the guys”, but really where “fun comes to thrive”. It is Craigslist for college students to find one another make plans, and, depending on the individuals involved, hookup.  

            It was only at the University of Chicago for a short time before its creators began getting email request to expand it to other universities/colleges. It is currently active at Columbia College Chicago, DePaul University, Loyola University Chicago, Northwestern University, and (of course) University of Chicago. As of April 1^st it will be started at Wash U in St. Louis and Yale and on the 4^th it will launch at Brown and RISD.

            The point of this is 20 or 10 years ago, this wouldn’t have occurred. College students would just go down to the bars or to the frats to find someone. So, in the new world of technology, while hooking up has become much easier (also much less of a stigma), it has also become extremely impersonal.

The Standing Ovation

You are in the commons sitting with your friends at one of the overcrowded tables basically yelling to try to be heard over the massive roar that the room seems to comprise of. More people keep piling into the room and the lines begin to look worse than they did when you waited three hours for your Lil Wayne ticket. Glancing down at the food that you now realized is significantly better than usual, you come to the revelation it an accepted students tour day. You share your newfound knowledge with your friends and together you examine the possibles standing in line, clutching their folders, making awkward small talk with one another while their parents look proudly and smugly around for their child has been accepted to Penn State.

The hearty atmosphere changes immediately when one of the tour students drops their drink glass. At the sound of the shattering glass, the dinning hall becomes instantly silent. Then, breaking the spell, one table breaks into a round of applause and rowdy cheers with more tables following suit. The movement gains momentum until most of the dinning hall is clapping and shouting with some even giving a standing ovation.  Eventually the movement dies down, the broken glass is cleared away, and the roar resumes.

This is a major kaiotic moment and honestly one I witness everytime there is a tour group. There is always some poor nervous or just plain accident-prone person (I am one of these people!) who drops something or shatters something and the student body of Penn State reverts to their elementary schools days to ridicule him/her. It is done out of necessity of the Penn State student body to show (and by that I mean humiliate) the accepted students that while they might be the big seniors now, they will be the underdog freshmen again next year.

kariotic survey

Today (Thursday) I had a major psychology exam. So, Wednesday night I found myself holed up in my floor’s study room going over my notecards and debating on whether or not to go get some sort of caffeinated drink from The Mix.  While considering this crucial choice, two girls came into the study room and asked if I had time to participate in a survey. In addition they did not tell me the subject of the survey.

Firstly, I must backtrack and must say they mentioned they were from the second floor of my building. This information is crucial to this “story”.

They asked me only three questions, but I feel if I knew the survey’s topic before I agreed to answer then I would have been better prepared. The questions were pretty close to (meaning might have been worded differently) 1) Are you a virgin? 2) Have you been more sexually active in college? 3) Do you think females are more sexually active in college?

Why I am posting this in a rhetoric blog is because it took advantage of a kariotic situation. This situation is completely full of karios because I live in one of the oldest dorms that is constantly falling apart.  For example one of the elevators is constantly broken (I live on the top floor) and we are always having the water turned off.  In addition, before spring break our building had construction done to some of the bathrooms and the entryway which along with a downed elevator caused major back-ups and dissatisfaction all around. So, when the girls said they were from the second floor and were doing a survey, but did not state the topic, I (like most people on my floor) automatically assumed it was about the building or the construction not sexuality.

Lester Bangs

Since my essay was about a public controversy, I thought it kind of fitting to write about a rhetoric idea from it that I did not cover in my paper. My essay was about Lester Bangs’ harsh announcement of Punk groupie Nancy Spungen’s death. In its duration I went over kairos, audience, and constraints, but did not explain the logos that made Bangs the ideal writer for this piece.

            Lester Bangs was a music journalist that is most known for writing for magazines like Rolling Stone or Creem (Punk Magazine).  When Spungen was killed, the Punk movement was still relatively new and had not developed a following outside of fellow Punks. (In a nutshell, a Punk is one who deviates from social norms). Thus, the public was not accepting of Punk music, Punk musicians, or the movement itself.

            Lester Bangs would have made for an ideal bridge between the two communities if only he had been able to remain impartial.  For he was known for his music savvy so therefore he could inform the populace, but was not a musician so therefore the mass public could relate to him.

            However, (as I mentioned in my paper) Lester Bangs ultimately chose career advancement over objectively informing the population and thus the tension between the Punks and their oppressors only intensified.